Armor Breaker →Used Deck

Comprehensive evaluation: It is somewhat easy to operate if there is a deployment means.
P summoning using Igknight can be deployed from your hand, so you can save time and effort.
Or is it okay to use 《Roll Out!》to equip it after using it as a link material?
With Warrior's 《Black Luster Soldier - Soldier of Chaos》, it is possible to destroy two cards with two attacks.
I have a feeling that the removal after the battles damage doesn't mesh well in the first place.

It's one of those cards awaiting reprints and errata.
Unions have slightly different specifications around the 9th term, and after the 9th term, you can use effects even if you equip them other than your own effects.
A typical example would be the combination of 《Sublimation Knight》and 《Squeaknight》.
However, since this card has not been recorded since season 9, it cannot SS itself even if it is equipped with Koa'ki Meiru War Arms.
This is exactly reproduced in Master Duel, and you can see the excellence of the debug team.
If he is errataed, he will be able to make Isolde, Two Tales of the Noble Knights with this GY card and Koa'ki Meiru War Arms, which will increase his value.
If you just want to play Isolde, you can replace it with any number of other cards, so let's take advantage of this card's own effect.
It works particularly well with 《Spell Striker》, and thanks to its direct attack effect, you can use this card's effect, and the return damage will be 0, and this time, 《Spell Striker》will remain on the field as a substitute for this card's battle destruction. Since the level and attributes are the same, you can share support and aim for rank 3Xyz.
Since 《Squeaknight》is the same Union warrior, it will be a big barrier, but let's try to differentiate them by being EARTH and different levels.
By the way, if you equip 《Squeaknight》with 《Koa'ki Meiru War Arms》, you can properly SS yourself. Master Duel is amazing.

It's an all-purpose removal, but you have to prepare this card and equip target to activate it, and you have to go through the battle, so the situation where it can be active tends to be limited. It is easy to be disturbed, and the loss when it is done is large.
A warrior's union is also a difficult element to use. Machines make up the majority of the Union, and the number of warriors is about the size of the Rokumu Goryoyo. It is an evaluation point that it is a blessed race that is easy to search once. Resistance is also battle limited and out of shape level.
I think it's a pretty tough card because of its unmatched effects and its time-consuming nature.

A Union Monster with a destructive effect. It's not bad per se, but it has to deal battles damage, so it's a bit unwieldy. It is quite disappointing considering that the effect destruction does not correspond to the resistance at the time of union, considering that it is an effect through battle. It is also painful that it does not support 《Reinforce Truth》.

A piece that is always in Oripa at the local shop and loses the desire to buy.
To be frank, it is difficult to say that you want to put one monster on the field.

The union itself is a considerable add loss. Don't do this on purpose. I wonder if it's just a substitute.

It's true that Union itself has a lot of add loss, so it's hard to use unless you're at the Gear Frame or Peacekeeper level.
Of course, it goes without saying that there's nothing you can do about just taking one after hitting.
Moreover, even though it is a new union, there is no substitute for effect destruction, which is even more disappointing...

I wanted to be able to remove battle destruction resistant monsters such as marshmallows and ghosts...
《Armor Break》... isn't it?
Armor...destroy it, right?
Also in terms of the union, it lowers the evaluation that it can only be used as a substitute for battle destruction.

First, the Union gimmick is too tightly tied to his Machine and doesn't build much of a relationship with Warrior. As a result, equipping this card is a pain, and building his deck for stable equipment is difficult.
The fact that it doesn't deal with effect destruction will probably be subject to errata when it's reprinted (I'll put aside whether it will be reprinted), but at the moment I have to say it's a big minus.
And when he is a trigger, when he gives battles damage, the card destruction of the benefit obtained is subtly mismatched. Normally, I would like to pay the damage by destroying the card and then deal with the damage...
In general, I don't feel the significance of putting this card in the Warrior Deck. The removal seems to require a lot of groundwork with this card.